AEO Score Report
What We Found
We analysed the website amulet.so, testing 14 queries with AI retrieving 8 results. The overall AEO score is 56/100, indicating a Good performance but with room for improvement in query retrieval. The most significant issue is the lack of a clear explanation of what Amulet does on the homepage; adding a straightforward sentence like 'Amulet helps [audience] do X' will enhance AI citation potential.
- Your pages are quite short — AI tools tend to cite content that goes into depth on a topic. Consider expanding your key pages with more detail.
- Your homepage doesn't clearly explain what Amulet does near the top. Add a simple sentence like 'Amulet is a [what you do]' or 'Amulet helps [audience] do X' — this is one of the strongest signals for getting cited by AI.
- Your content has very few specific numbers or stats. AI tools tend to cite concrete claims over general ones — try including figures like percentages, counts, or comparisons where relevant.
- No matching content for 12 queries: "best tools for maintain shared workspaces for collaborative AI training", "best tools for access large datasets quickly and efficiently", "best tools for instantly fork isolated workspaces" and more
- 8/14 queries are citation-ready
- Brand present in most retrieved chunks (avg B: 1.00)
- No FAQ structured data found — adding this helps Google display your answers prominently in search results
- Your blog or article pages aren't marked up for search engines — this is a quick win for Google visibility
Query Alignment — 14 Queries
| Query | Retrieval | Brand | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| best tools for maintain shared workspaces for collaborative AI training content not found — no page answers this query | 0.49 | 1.00 | Content Present |
| best tools for access large datasets quickly and efficiently content not found — no page answers this query | 0.40 | 1.00 | Content Present |
| best tools for instantly fork isolated workspaces content not found — no page answers this query | 0.51 | 1.00 | Content Present |
| best tools for capture and restore versioned states of datasets content not found — no page answers this query | 0.39 | 1.00 | Gap |
| what are the best practices for maintaining shared workspaces in collaborative ai training? content not found — no page answers this query | 0.47 | 1.00 | Content Present |
| what are the best ways to quickly and efficiently access large datasets? content not found — no page answers this query | 0.39 | 1.00 | Gap |
| best tools for merge and roll back changes without data copying content not found — no page answers this query | 0.34 | 1.00 | Gap |
| how to capture and restore versioned states of datasets content not found — no page answers this query | 0.35 | 1.00 | Gap |
| how to instantly fork isolated workspaces content not found — no page answers this query | 0.49 | 1.00 | Content Present |
| how to merge and roll back changes without data copying content not found — no page answers this query | 0.30 | 1.00 | Gap |
| top high-performance file system for parallel AI workloads tools 2026 | 0.59 | 1.00 | Content Present |
| which high-performance file system works best for data scientists managing parallel ai workloads? | 0.56 | 1.00 | Content Present |
| which are the best tools for merging and undoing changes without data copying? content not found — no page answers this query | 0.37 | 1.00 | Gap |
| high-performance file system for parallel AI workloads vs SEO content not found — no page answers this query | 0.55 | 1.00 | Content Present |
Frequently Asked Questions
Because AI systems only select content they can directly use as answers. If your content doesn’t match queries or isn’t structured clearly, it won’t be picked.
It’s an analysis of how your content performs in AI systems—showing what gets selected, what doesn’t, and why.
SEO focuses on ranking pages. AEO focuses on being selected and used in AI-generated answers.
