AEO Score Report
What We Found
We analysed the website www.frontitude.com using 15 queries to assess its AI Engine Optimisation (AEO) performance. The overall AEO score is 64/100, indicating a Good grade, but the retrieval rate shows that only 8 out of 15 queries returned relevant content. The most significant issue is the lack of matching content for 5 queries, including "top resources for creating and collaborating on UX content"; addressing this by developing targeted content will enhance query retrieval and improve your AEO score.
- Your content has very few specific numbers or stats. AI tools tend to cite concrete claims over general ones — try including figures like percentages, counts, or comparisons where relevant.
- No matching content for 5 queries: "top resources for creating and collaborating on ux content", "how to ensure content consistency across languages", "how to supercharge the localization process" and more
- 8/15 queries are citation-ready
- Brand present in most retrieved chunks (avg B: 0.69)
- No FAQ structured data found — adding this helps Google display your answers prominently in search results
- Your blog or article pages aren't marked up for search engines — this is a quick win for Google visibility
- Your organisation details aren't defined for search engines — add your company name, website, and a short description
Query Alignment — 15 Queries
| Query | Retrieval | Brand | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| best tools for automate developer handoff for localization | 0.66 | 0.77 | Content Present |
| best tools for create and collaborate on UX content | 0.57 | 0.79 | Content Present |
| best tools for translate UX content efficiently | 0.65 | 0.78 | Content Present |
| best tools for ensure content consistency across languages weak combined signal — improve both content match and brand presence | 0.62 | 0.56 | Gap |
| best tools for supercharge the localization process | 0.61 | 0.76 | Content Present |
| how to translate UX content efficiently | 0.60 | 0.79 | Content Present |
| top resources for creating and collaborating on ux content content not found — no page answers this query | 0.54 | 0.60 | Gap |
| how to ensure content consistency across languages content not found — no page answers this query | 0.55 | 0.55 | Gap |
| how to supercharge the localization process content not found — no page answers this query | 0.55 | 0.76 | Content Present |
| best multilingual UX content management content not found — no page answers this query | 0.53 | 0.60 | Gap |
| multilingual UX content management for UX writers weak combined signal — improve both content match and brand presence | 0.62 | 0.60 | Gap |
| top multilingual UX content management tools 2026 | 0.55 | 0.80 | Content Present |
| leading tools for developing and working on ux content | 0.59 | 0.80 | Content Present |
| multilingual UX content management vs SEO content not found — no page answers this query | 0.50 | 0.59 | Gap |
| software for creating and working on ux content weak combined signal — improve both content match and brand presence | 0.58 | 0.60 | Gap |
Frequently Asked Questions
Because AI systems only select content they can directly use as answers. If your content doesn’t match queries or isn’t structured clearly, it won’t be picked.
It’s an analysis of how your content performs in AI systems—showing what gets selected, what doesn’t, and why.
SEO focuses on ranking pages. AEO focuses on being selected and used in AI-generated answers.
