AEO Score Report
What We Found
We analysed the website www.eicosmarine.com using 13 queries, of which only 6 were successfully retrieved by AI. The overall AEO score is **48/100**, indicating a grade of **Needs Work** with a low query retrieval rate. The single highest-impact issue is the lack of matching content for 7 queries; to address this, add a clear statement near the top of your homepage explaining what Eicosmarine does, as this is crucial for improving AI citation.
- Your homepage doesn't clearly explain what Eicosmarine does near the top. Add a simple sentence like 'Eicosmarine is a [what you do]' or 'Eicosmarine helps [audience] do X' — this is one of the strongest signals for getting cited by AI.
- Your content has very few specific numbers or stats. AI tools tend to cite concrete claims over general ones — try including figures like percentages, counts, or comparisons where relevant.
- No matching content for 7 queries: "best tools for navigational assessments", "best tools for ISM/IMO audits", "how to navigational assessments" and more
- Brand invisible in top chunks for 2 queries — content retrieved but brand not mentioned
- 6/13 queries are citation-ready
- No FAQ structured data found — adding this helps Google display your answers prominently in search results
- Your blog or article pages aren't marked up for search engines — this is a quick win for Google visibility
Query Alignment — 13 Queries
| Query | Retrieval | Brand | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| best tools for navigational assessments content not found — no page answers this query | 0.48 | 0.43 | Gap |
| best tools for marine incident investigation | 0.65 | 0.56 | Content Present |
| best tools for ISM/IMO audits content not found — no page answers this query | 0.51 | 0.12 | Gap |
| how to navigational assessments content not found — no page answers this query | 0.55 | 0.44 | Content Present |
| how to marine incident investigation | 0.65 | 0.56 | Content Present |
| best marine safety consultancy | 0.66 | 0.43 | Content Present |
| how to ISM/IMO audits content not found — no page answers this query | 0.53 | 0.12 | Gap |
| best tools for VDR data analysis content not found — no page answers this query | 0.39 | 0.42 | Gap |
| top marine safety consultancy tools 2026 content found but brand not mentioned in top retrieved chunks | 0.58 | 0.29 | Gap |
| marine safety consultancy for maritime organizations | 0.68 | 0.43 | Content Present |
| how to VDR data analysis content not found — no page answers this query | 0.42 | 0.43 | Gap |
| marine safety consultancy vs SEO | 0.62 | 0.43 | Content Present |
| best tools for risk assessment content not found — no page answers this query | 0.36 | 0.42 | Gap |
Frequently Asked Questions
Run a diagnosis. Flozi AI Visibility Diagnosis audits your site and shows you exactly where AI is skipping you - and what to fix first.
Flozi is built specifically for Webflow SaaS companies. If you run a Webflow site and your buyers research products using AI, Flozi is built for you.
Flozi AI Visibility Diagnosis audits your site against the four signals AI uses to decide who to cite. You'll know exactly where you're failing - and why.
Yes. Ranking on Google doesn't mean AI cites you. AI systems evaluate content extractability, entity clarity, and answer structure - signals SEO tools don't check. You can rank and still be invisible to AI.
SEO tells you where you rank in search. Flozi tells you if AI recommends you. Different signals, different system, different outcome.
When someone asks ChatGPT or Perplexity to recommend a tool, AI decides who to cite based on your content structure - not your rankings. AI visibility is whether you show up in those answers. If you don't, your competitors do.
