AEO Score Report
What We Found
We analysed the website www.hivel.ai, testing 15 queries with an overall retrieval rate of 53%. The site received a score of 71/100, indicating a Good grade, but there is a significant issue with 13 queries returning no matching content, including critical topics like "best tools for provide real-time activity data for agile practices". To improve performance, we recommend creating targeted content to address these gaps, ensuring alignment with user queries and enhancing visibility in AI-driven search results.
- No matching content for 13 queries: "best tools for provide real-time activity data for agile practices", "best tools for automate code reviews", "best tools for track engineering team performance" and more
- 8/15 queries are citation-ready
- Brand present in most retrieved chunks (avg B: 0.74)
- No FAQ structured data found — adding this helps Google display your answers prominently in search results
- Your blog or article pages aren't marked up for search engines — this is a quick win for Google visibility
- Your organisation details aren't defined for search engines — add your company name, website, and a short description
Query Alignment — 15 Queries
| Query | Retrieval | Brand | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| best tools for provide real-time activity data for agile practices content not found — no page answers this query | 0.52 | 0.82 | Content Present |
| best tools for automate code reviews content not found — no page answers this query | 0.52 | 0.58 | Gap |
| best tools for track engineering team performance content not found — no page answers this query | 0.52 | 0.61 | Gap |
| best tools for measure AI ROI content not found — no page answers this query | 0.51 | 1.00 | Content Present |
| best tools for forecast project releases content not found — no page answers this query | 0.44 | 0.42 | Gap |
| how to provide real-time activity data for agile practices content not found — no page answers this query | 0.49 | 0.82 | Content Present |
| how to track engineering team performance content not found — no page answers this query | 0.53 | 0.61 | Gap |
| top tools for monitoring engineering team performance content not found — no page answers this query | 0.54 | 0.80 | Content Present |
| how to measure AI ROI content not found — no page answers this query | 0.45 | 0.82 | Gap |
| top tools for anticipating project releases content not found — no page answers this query | 0.46 | 0.42 | Gap |
| software for measuring ai roi content not found — no page answers this query | 0.48 | 1.00 | Content Present |
| how to forecast project releases content not found — no page answers this query | 0.42 | 0.43 | Gap |
| engineering analytics platform for engineering managers | 0.61 | 0.80 | Content Present |
| best engineering analytics platform | 0.58 | 1.00 | Content Present |
| applications to assess ai roi content not found — no page answers this query | 0.48 | 1.00 | Content Present |
Frequently Asked Questions
Run a diagnosis. Flozi AI Visibility Diagnosis audits your site and shows you exactly where AI is skipping you - and what to fix first.
Flozi is built specifically for Webflow SaaS companies. If you run a Webflow site and your buyers research products using AI, Flozi is built for you.
Flozi AI Visibility Diagnosis audits your site against the four signals AI uses to decide who to cite. You'll know exactly where you're failing - and why.
Yes. Ranking on Google doesn't mean AI cites you. AI systems evaluate content extractability, entity clarity, and answer structure - signals SEO tools don't check. You can rank and still be invisible to AI.
SEO tells you where you rank in search. Flozi tells you if AI recommends you. Different signals, different system, different outcome.
When someone asks ChatGPT or Perplexity to recommend a tool, AI decides who to cite based on your content structure - not your rankings. AI visibility is whether you show up in those answers. If you don't, your competitors do.
